Style cleanup.

Add some note about the main reason why st is still that big.
This commit is contained in:
Christoph Lohmann 2014-03-01 11:04:03 +01:00
parent d2ec39f0ef
commit 1584956a60

17
st.c
View file

@ -3091,6 +3091,7 @@ xdraws(char *s, Glyph base, int x, int y, int charlen, int bytelen) {
if(base.fg == defaultfg)
base.fg = defaultunderline;
}
if(IS_TRUECOL(base.fg)) {
colfg.alpha = 0xffff;
colfg.red = TRUERED(base.fg);
@ -3113,8 +3114,6 @@ xdraws(char *s, Glyph base, int x, int y, int charlen, int bytelen) {
bg = &dc.col[base.bg];
}
if(base.mode & ATTR_BOLD) {
if(BETWEEN(base.fg, 0, 7)) {
/* basic system colors */
@ -3144,7 +3143,8 @@ xdraws(char *s, Glyph base, int x, int y, int charlen, int bytelen) {
colfg.green = ~fg->color.green;
colfg.blue = ~fg->color.blue;
colfg.alpha = fg->color.alpha;
XftColorAllocValue(xw.dpy, xw.vis, xw.cmap, &colfg, &revfg);
XftColorAllocValue(xw.dpy, xw.vis, xw.cmap, &colfg,
&revfg);
fg = &revfg;
}
@ -3155,7 +3155,8 @@ xdraws(char *s, Glyph base, int x, int y, int charlen, int bytelen) {
colbg.green = ~bg->color.green;
colbg.blue = ~bg->color.blue;
colbg.alpha = bg->color.alpha;
XftColorAllocValue(xw.dpy, xw.vis, xw.cmap, &colbg, &revbg);
XftColorAllocValue(xw.dpy, xw.vis, xw.cmap, &colbg,
&revbg);
bg = &revbg;
}
}
@ -3258,6 +3259,8 @@ xdraws(char *s, Glyph base, int x, int y, int charlen, int bytelen) {
* Nothing was found in the cache. Now use
* some dozen of Fontconfig calls to get the
* font for one single character.
*
* Xft and fontconfig are design failures.
*/
fcpattern = FcPatternDuplicate(font->pattern);
fccharset = FcCharSetCreate();
@ -3301,6 +3304,12 @@ xdraws(char *s, Glyph base, int x, int y, int charlen, int bytelen) {
xp += xw.cw * wcwidth(u8char);
}
/*
* This is how the loop above actually should be. Why does the
* application have to care about font details?
*
* I have to repeat: Xft and Fontconfig are design failures.
*/
/*
XftDrawStringUtf8(xw.draw, fg, font->set, winx,
winy + font->ascent, (FcChar8 *)s, bytelen);